Window Quarterly Vol. 3, No. 2, 1993 Copyright 1993 [Permission is granted to use, print, reproduce this article provided the following acknowledgment is given: From Window Quarterly 3, 2 (1993); ACRAG c. 1993. *** ENGLISH AS THE LANGUAGE OF THE CHURCH IN AMERICA by Ara Dolarian The American born Armenians who do not have the Armenian language skills are no less Armenians than those who speak the language. Both share the same culture, traditions and religious heritage. Both are the children of the fortunate survivors of the tragic events of 19th and early 20th century. They are also potentially the catalysts that will keep the Armenian Church alive in the United States. Regrettably, most American Armenian do not have the Armenian language skills. They are unable to fully participate in the practice of their religion. Though the doors of the Church are open, in reality, the doors are closed since the English speaking population does not understand the Church's religious rites and teachings. Through the years, the Church has protected and preserved our religious, cultural and national identity. It has been the repository of the wisdom, truths, and philosophical thoughts that have historically bound the Armenian Christian community together. Most Armenian speaking people believe that preserving the Armenian language in the practice of the religion is a key factor in the preservation of the Armenian Church and the perpetuation of the Armenian culture. Unfortunately, the Armenian language no longer unites the Armenian community. The lack of Armenian language skills prevents the English speaking population from becoming meaningfully involved in the Church. If the Church hopes to continue its role to teach, unify, and lead its followers in worship, the Church must recognize and understand the changing characteristics of American Armenians and celebrate the Church's services in English. This is critical if the American Armenians are to retain their identification with the Church and perpetuate it in this country. The questions of language would not have been a factor had we as Americans lived in a closed Armenian community where Armenian was the spoken language. That is not possible or desirable if the American Armenian is to be a participant in the mainstream of the American society. The Church's hierarchy must decide whether it wishes to reach out to the American Armenian population. It must decide if it wants to be alive in the lives of these children of the Church. Without such an effort on the part of the Church, the assimilation process into American congregations will continue to accelerate. The American churches have and continue to aggressively reach out to attract the American Armenians to their congregations. They clearly and convincingly communicate those fundamental Christian teachings which our people need. In as much as the Armenian Church has been unable to satisfy the religious aspirations of many American born, they have no alternative but to go with those who worship in a meaningful and relevant way. Though the American born Armenians may have strong emotional and intellectual ties with their background, as they become more integrated into the mainstream of American society, their identification with their past becomes more difficult to maintain. The power of the dominant American culture is undeniably powerful, rich and attractive. It offers the population all the rights and options a free society can offer. Among those is religious freedom. The concept of religious freedom must be clearly appreciated as a golden opportunity for the Armenian Church. It offers the freedom to enhance and expand our Church's mission. It would seem to be in the Church's best interest to take advantage of this long awaited opportunity to reestablish our faith in the lives of the American born Armenian and communicate the Church's understandings with its people. The Armenians have withstood impossible obstacles and challenges throughout their history and sustained themselves with their Christian faith. The contemporary American culture places another challenge at the door of the Church. Meeting this obstacle and overcoming it will assure it a more meaningful and productive future in this part of the world. *** =================================================== _ _ _ _ _ |_| ___ _| | ___ _ _ _ | | | | | | _ / _ \ / _ | / _ \ | | | | | | | |_| |_| || |_ | | | || |_| || |_| || |_| |_| | \_________/\___||_| |_| \___/ \___/ \_________/ View Of The Armenian Church ===================================================