Window Quarterly Vol. 2, No. 3, 1991 Copyright 1991 [Permission is granted to use, print, reproduce this article provided the following acknowledgment is given: From Window Quarterly 2, 3 (1991); ACRAG c. 1991. *** Joint-Commission of the Theological Dialogue Between The Eastern & Oriental Orthodox Churches Orthodox Centre of Ecumenical Patriarchate Geneva September 23 - 28, l990 INTRODUCTION The third meeting of the Joint Commission of the Theological Dialogue between the Orthodox Church and the Oriental Orthodox Churches took place at the Orthodox Centre of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, Chambesy, Geneva, from September 23rd to 28th, l990. The official representatives of the two families of the Orthodox Churches and their advisors met in an atmosphere of prayerful waiting on the Holy Spirit and warm, cordial, Christian brotherly affection. We experienced the gracious and generous hospitality of His Holiness Patriarch Dimitrios I, through of His Eminence Metropolitan Damaskinos of Switzerland in the Orthodox Centre of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. We were also received two grand receptions, one at the residence of Metropolitan Damaskinos and the other at the residence of His Excellency Mr. Kerkinos, the Ambassador of Greece to the United Nations, and Mrs. Kerkinos. The 34 participants (see list of participants) came from Austria, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, Egypt, Ethiopia, Finland, Greece, India, Lebanon, Poland, Switzerland, Syria, U.K., U.S.A., U.S.S.R. (Russian Church, Georgian Church and Armenian Church), and Yugoslavia. The six days of meetings were co-chaired by His Eminence Metropolitan Damaskinos of Switzerland and His Grace Metropolitan Bishop of Damiette. His Eminence Metropolitan Damaskinos in his inaugural address exhorted the participants to "work in a spirit of humility, brotherly love and mutual recognition" so that "the Lord of the Faith and Head of His Church" will guide us by the Holy Spirit on the speedier way towards unity and communion. The meeting received two reports, one from its Theological Sub-Committee, which met at the Orthodox Centre, Chambesy (20-22, l990), and the other from its Sub- Committee on Pastoral Relations, which met at the Anba Bishoy Monastery, Egypt (Jan. 3l - Feb.. 4, l990). The following papers which had been presented to the Theological Sub-Committee were distributed to the participants: l. Dogmatic Formulations and Anathemas by Local and Ecumenical Synods within their Social Context - Rev. Prof. John S. Romanides, Church of Greece. 2. Anathemas and Conciliar Decisions Two issues to be settled for Restoration of Communion Among Oriental Orthodox and Eastern Orthodox Churches - Dr. Paulos Mar Gregorios, Metropolitan of Delhi, Orthodox Syrian Church of the East. 3. Historical Factors and the Council of Chalcedon - Fr. T. Malaty, Coptic Orthodox Church. 4. Historical Factors and the Terminology of the Synod of Chalcedon (45l) - Prof. Dr. Vlassios Phidas, Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Alexandria. 5. Interpretation of Christological Dogmas Today - Metropolitan George Khodr - Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch. 6. Interpretation of Christological Dogmas Today - Bishop Mesrob Krikorian, Armenian Apostolic Church of Etchmiadzin. The six papers and the two Sub-Committee reports, along with the "Summary of Conclusions" of the Fourth Unofficial Conversations of Addis Ababa (l97l) which was appended to the report of the Theological Sub-Committee, formed the basis of our intensive and friendly discussion on the issues and actions to be taken. A drafting committee composed of Metropolitan George Khodr, Metropolitan Paulos Mar Gregorios, Archbishop Keshishian, Archbishop Garima, Rev. Prof. John Romanides, Metropolitan Matta Mar Eustathius (Syria) Prof. Ivan Dimitrov (Bulgaria) with Prof. V. Phidas and Bishop Krikorian as co-secretaries, produced the draft for the Second Agreed Statement and Recommendations to Churches. Another drafting Committee composed of Prof. Papavassiliou (Cyprus), Bishop Christoforos (Czechoslovakia), Metropolitan Paulos Mar Gregorios and Liqaselttanat Habtemariam (Ethopia), with Fr. Dr. George Dragas as secretary, produced the draft for the Recommendations on Pastoral issues. Following, is the text of the unanimously approved Second Agreed Statement and Recommendations. SECOND AGREED STATEMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CHURCHES The first Agreed Statement on Christology (Annex l) adopted by the Joint Commission of the Theological Dialogue between the Orthodox and Oriental Churches, at our historic meeting at the Anba Bishoy Monastery, Egypt, from 20th to 24th June l989 forms the basis of this Second Agreed Statement on the following affirmations of our common faith and understanding, and recommendations on steps to be taken for the communion of our two families of Churches in Jesus Christ our Lord, who prayed "that they all may be one". l. Both families agree in condemning the Eutychian heresy. Both families confess that the Logos, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, only begotten of the Father before the ages and consubstantial with Him, was incarnate and was born from the Virgin Mary Theotokos; fully consubstantial with us, perfect man with soul, body and mind; he was crucified, died, was buried, and rose from the dead on the third day, ascended to the Heavenly Father, where He sits on the right hand of the Father as Lord of all Creation. At Pentecost, by the coming of the Holy Spirit He manifested the Church as His Body. We look forward to His coming again in the fullness of His glory, according to the Scriptures. 2. Both families condemn the Nestorian heresy and the crypto-Nestorianism of Theodoret of Cyrus. They agree that it is not sufficient merely to say that Christ is consubstantial both with His Father and with us, by nature God and by nature man; it is necessary to affirm also that the Logos, Who is by nature God, became by nature Man, by His Incarnation in the fullness of time. 3. Both families agree that the Hypostasis of the Logos became composite by uniting to His divine uncreated nature with its natural will and energy, which He has in common with the Father and the Holy Spirit, created human nature, which He assumed at the Incarnation and made His own, with its natural will and energy. 4. Both families agree that the natures with their proper energies and wills are united hypostatically and naturally without confusion, without change, without division and without separation, and that they are distinguished in thought alone. 5. Both families agree that He who wills and acts is always the one Hypostasis of the Logos incarnate. 6. Both families agree in rejecting interpretations of Councils which do not fully agree with the Horos of the Third Ecumenical Council and the letter (433) of Cyril of Alexandria to John of Antioch. 7. The Orthodox agree that the Oriental Orthodox will continue to maintain their traditional cyrillian terminology of "one nature of the incarnate Logos", since they acknowledge the double consubstantiality of the Logos which Eutyches denied. The Orthodox also use this terminology. The Oriental Orthodox agree that the Orthodox are justified in their use of the two-natures formula, since they acknowledge that the distinction is "in thought alone". Cyril interpreted correctly this use in his letter to John of Antioch and his letters to Acacius of Melitene (PG 77, l84-20l), to Eulogius (PG 77, 224-228)and to Succensus (PG 77, 228-245). 8. Both families accept the first three Ecumenical Councils, which form our common heritage. In relation to the four later Councils of the Orthodox Church, the Orthodox state that for them the above points l-7 are the teachings also of the four later Councils of the Orthodox Church, while the Oriental Orthodox consider this statement of the Orthodox as their interpretation. With this understanding, the Oriental Orthodox respond to it positively. In relation to the teaching of the Seventh Ecumenical Council of the Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox agree that the theology and practice of the veneration of icons taught by that Council are in basic agreement with the teaching and practice of the Oriental Orthodox from ancient times, long before the convening of the Council, and that we have no disagreements in this regard. 9. In the light of our Agreed Statement on Christology as well as of the above common affirmations, we have now clearly understood that both families have always loyally maintained the same authentic Orthodox Christological faith, and the unbroken continuity of the apostolic tradition, though they may have used Christological terms in different ways. It is this common faith and continuous loyalty to the Apostolic Tradition that should be the basis of our unity and communion. l0. Both families agree that all the anathemas and condemnations of the past which now divide us should be lifted by the Churches in order that the last obstacle to the full unity and communion of our two families can be removed by the grace and power of God. Both families agree that the lifting of anathemas and condemnations will be consummated on the basis that the Councils and Fathers previously anathematized or condemned are not heretical. We therefore recommend to our Churches the following practical steps: A. The Orthodox should lift all anathemas and condemnations against all Oriental Orthodox Councils and fathers whom they have anathematized or condemned in the past. B. The Oriental Orthodox should at the same time lift all anathemas and condemnations against all Orthodox Councils and fathers, whom they have anathematized or condemned in the past. C. The manner in which the anathemas are to be lifted should be decided by the Churches individually. Trusting in the power of the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth, Unity and Love, we submit this Agreed Statement and Recommendations to our venerable Churches for their consideration and action, praying that the same Spirit will lead us to that unity for which our Lord prayed and prays. Recommendations on Pastoral issues The Joint Commission of the Theological Dialogue between the Orthodox Church and the Oriental Orthodox Churches, at its meeting at the Orthodox Centre of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, in Chambesy, Geneva from September 23rd to 28th, l990, received a report from its Joint Pastoral Sub- committee which had met at the Anb a Bishoy Monastery in Egypt from 3lst January to 4th February l990. The report was the starting point for an extended discussion of four types of pastoral issues: I. Relations among our two families of Churches 1. We feel as a Joint Theological Commission that a period of intense preparation of our people to participate in the implementation of our recommendations and in the restoration of communion of our Churches is needed. To this end we propose the following practical procedure. 2. It is important to plan an exchange of visits by our heads of Church and prelates, priests and lay people of each one of our two families of Churches to the other. 3. It is important to give further encouragement to exchange of theological professors and students among theological institutions of two families for periods varying from one week to several years. 4. In localities where Churches of the two families co-exist, the congregations should organize participation of one group of people - men, women, youth and children, including priests, where possible from one congregation of one family to a congregation of the other to attend in the latter's eucharistic worship on Sundays and feast days. 5. Publications (a) We need to publish, in the various languages of our Churches, the key documents of this Joint Commission with explanatory notes, in small pamphlets to be sold at a reasonable price in all our congregations. (b) It will be useful also to have brief pamphlets explaining in simple terms the meaning of the Christological terminology and interpreting the variety of terminology taken by various persons and groups in the course of history in the light of our agreed statement on Christology. (c) We need a book which gives some brief account, both historical and descriptive, of all the Churches of our two families. This should also be produced in the various languages of our peoples, with pictures and photographs as much as possible. (d) We need to promote brief books of Church History by specialist authors giving a more positive understanding of the divergences of the fifth, sixth and seventh centuries. 6. Churches of both families should agree that they will not rebaptize members of each other, for recognition of the baptism of the Church of our two families, if they have not already done so. 7. Churches should initiate bilateral negotiations for facilitating each other in using each other's church premises in special cases where any of them is deprived of such means. 8. Where conflicts arise between Churches of our two families, e.g. a) marriages consecrated in one Church being annulled by a bishop of another Church; b) marriages between members of our two families, being celebrated in one church over against the other, c) or children from such marriages being forced to join the one church against the other, the Churches involved should come to bilateral agreements on the procedure to be adopted until such problems are finally solved by our union. 9. The Churches of both families should be encouraged to look into the theological curriculum and books used in their institutions and make necessary additions and changes in them with the view to promoting better understanding of the other family of Churches. They may also profitably devise programmes for instructing the pastors and people in our congregations on the issues related to the union of the two families. II. Relations of our Churches with other Christian Churches in the world l0. Our common participation in the Ecumenical Movement and our involvement in the World Council of Churches needs better co-ordination to make it more effective and fruitful for the promotion of the faith which was once delivered to the saints in the context of the Ecumenical Movement. We could have a preliminary discussion of this question at the Seventh Assembly of the WCC at Camberra, Australia, in February l99l as well as in regional and national councils of Churches and work out an appropriate scheme for more effective co-ordination of our efforts. ll. There are crucial issues in which our two families agree fundamentally and have disagreements with the Roman Catholic and Protestant Churches. We could organize small joint consultations on issues like (a) the position and role of the woman in the life of the Church and our common Orthodox response to the contemporary problem of other Christian communities concerning the ordination of women to the priesthood, (b) pastoral care for mixed marriages between Orthodox and heterodox Christians, (c) marriages between Orthodox Christians and members of other religions, (d) the Orthodox position on dissolution of annulment of marriage, divorce and separation of married couples (e) abortion. 12. A joint consultation should be held on the burning problem of Proselytism, vis-a-vis religious freedom to draw up the framework of an agreement with other Churches, for the procedure to be followed when an Orthodox or Oriental Orthodox person or family wants to join another (Catholic or Protestant) Church or vice-versa. 13. A special joint consultation should be held on the theology and practice of Uniatism in the Roman Catholic Church, as a prelude to a discussion with the Roman Catholic Church on this subject. 14. We need to have another joint consultation to co- ordinate the results of the several bilateral conversations now going on or held in the past by Churches of our two families with other Catholic and Protestant Churches. III. Our common service to the world of suffering, need, injustice and conflicts 15. We need to think together how best we could co-ordinate our existing schemes for promoting our humanitarian and philanthropic projects in the socio-ethnic context of our peoples and of the world at large. This would entail our common approach to such problems as: (a) hunger and poverty, (b) sickness and suffering, (c) political, religions and social discrimination, (d) refugees and victims of war, (e) youth, drugs and unemployment, (f) the mentally and physically handicapped, (g) the old and the aged. IV. Our co-operation in the propagation of the Christian Faith. l6. We need to encourage and promote mutual co-operation as far as possible in the work of our inner mission to our people, i.e., instructing them in the faith, and how to cope with modern dangers arising from contemporary secularism, including cults, ideologies, materialism, aids, homosexuality, the permissive society, consumerism, etc. 17. We also need to find a proper way for collaborating with each other and with other Christians in the Christian mission to the world without undermining the authority and integrity of the local Orthodox Churches. Orthodox members of the joint commission signing the statement: Metropolitan Damaskinos Co-President (Ecumenical Patriarchate) Prof. Vlassios Phidas Co-Secretary Greek Orth. Patr. Alexandria Prof. Athanasios Arvanitis (Ecumenical Patriarchate) Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Peristerion Ecumenical Patriarchate Prof. Father George Dragas Ecumenical Patriarchate Metropolitan Petros of Aksum Greek Orthodox Patr. Alexandria Metropolitan George Khodr Greek Orthodox Patr. Antioch Mr. Nikolai Zabolotski Russian Patriarchate Grigorij Skobej Russian Patriarchate Prof. Stojan Gosevic Serbian Patriarchate Dr. Ivan Zhelev Dimitrov Bulgarian Patriarchate Metropolitan David Sukhum Georgian Patriarchate Boris Gagua Georgian Patriarchate Horepiskopos Barnabas of Salamis Church of Cyprus Prof. Andreas-Papavasiliou Church of Cyprus Metropolitan Meletios of Nikopolis Church of Greece Prof. Father John Romanides Church of Greece Bishop Jeremiasz of Wroclaw Polish Orthodox Church Bishop Christoforos of Olomouc Orthodox Church in Czechoslovakia Father Joseph Hauser Orthodox Church in Czechoslovakia Father Heikki Huttunen Finnish Orthodox Church Oriental Orthodox members of the joint commission signing the statement: Metropolitan Bishoi Co-President (Coptic Orthodox Church) Bishop Dr. Mesrob Krikorian Co-Secretary Armenian Church, Etchmiadzin Metropolitan Dr. Paulos Mar Gregorios Orthodox Syrian Church of the East Doctorate Joseph M. Faltas Coptic Orthodox Church Bishop Serapion Coptic Orthodox Church Father Tadros Y. Malaty Coptic Orthodox Church Metropolitan Eustathius Matta Rouhm Syrian Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch Archbishop Aram Keshishian Armenian Church, Cilicia Archbishop Mesrob Ashdjian Armenian Church, Cilicia Father George Kondortha Orthodox Syrian Church of the East Archbishop Abba Gerima of Eluvabur Ethiopian Orthodox Church Rev. Habte Mariam Warkineh Ethiopian Orthodox Church *** =================================================== _ _ _ _ _ |_| ___ _| | ___ _ _ _ | | | | | | _ / _ \ / _ | / _ \ | | | | | | | |_| |_| || |_ | | | || |_| || |_| || |_| |_| | \_________/\___||_| |_| \___/ \___/ \_________/ View Of The Armenian Church ===================================================